Thrasher said:
When are they going to fit cyclists with such devices?
Thrasher said:
While it might be a legal requirement - not many of the Lycra clad "the rules of the road don't apply to me" brigade have them. I think the risk of being hit by a speeding cyclist is higher than a large car which is *easier* to see. This whole nanny state thing is getting bonkers tbh.
Seriously? :roll: A cyclist hitting you at 15mph isn't going to kill you and is likely to cause little more than superficial cuts and bruises. A cyclist has a voice which is far louder than a bell. :roll: A 2-ton PHEV hitting you at 15mph can cause serious damage or death. Which do you think is safer? :roll:
And who needs a "nanny state"? All those vulnerable people for whom this is designed don't need protecting. If we remove these rules and more of them die, it's obviously no concern of ours. :roll:
Selfish and stupid! :twisted: