maby said:Speaking as an ex-Prius owner, I'm coming to the conclusion that the Outlander is really two cars sharing a single body shell.
The hybrid systems in the Prius are tightly integrated - they have to be because the battery pack only has a range of a couple of miles. The car is continually playing the petrol engine and the electrical drive off against each other to get best fuel economy - the battery is more a temporary store for excess power coming out of the petrol engine and the electric motor is more akin to a turbocharger, allowing the car to turn in decent acceleration from an engine which is objectively lacking on power and has a terrible power curve.
The Outlander is less tightly integrated. You have an electrical transmission which can receive its power from either the battery pack or from the generator attached to the engine - with a special case at high speed where the engine can be physically coupled to the wheels. The car's default behaviour is to run as pure electrical till the battery goes flat, then fall back to pure petrol with an electrical transmission until you recharge the battery. You have a limited ability to modify this behaviour with the "Save" and "Charge" buttons, but it is never going to be the tightly integrated hybrid system that the Prius is. I guess that you might slightly improve the fuel economy by playing with those buttons, but I doubt that the overall impact will be very high.
Also as an ex Prius driver I think that is a pretty accurate description. Is also add, for other readers, that the Prius ALWAYS runs in parallel hybrid mode when the engine runs so is always as economical as possible. I think the patents on the Toyota hybrid system are about to expire so there may be a more cars using their system which is probably the best system available bar none.
Kind regards
Mark